On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 12:54:13PM +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > PR fortran/42118 concerns slow performance of FORALL.
> > Does anyone care if I close the PR as WONTFIX? If someone
> > answers "Yes, I care", be prepared to present your patch.
> Comment #6 is already fixed with the loop interchange.
> The original test case depends on extending alias analysis in
> a quite complex manner - I'm not about to do this.
> So I have no objection to you closing this PR.
Thanks for taking a look at the PR. The original test case
was submitted 10 years ago. I assume, that after 10 years,
no one on this list cares about the performance of FORALL.
With FORALL moved to the obsolescent feature list, it will
get pushed even farther down the list of bugs. It is a
simple matter of too many bugs, too little time, and
too few active patch contributors. FORALL works (short
of any actual bugs).