Re: [Patch, fortran] PR86248 - [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR86248 - [7/8/9/10 Regression] LEN_TRIM in specification expression causes link failure

Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Steve,

Thanks for the heads up. I'll get on to it right away.

Regards

Paul

On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 at 20:04, Steve Kargl
<[hidden email]> wrote:

>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:39:55PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, this is a 6-regression as well - ***sigh***
> >
> > The patch is fundamentally very simple. Symbols that were marked with
> > the fn_result_spec flag that really were module parameters were having
> > the wrong name mangling applied to them. The rest of the patch is a
> > tidy up.
> >
> > Regtested on FC30/x86_64 - OK for all the branches after a bedding in
> > period on trunk?
> >
>
> OK.  Note you cannot wait too long for 7 or 9.  The 7 branch
> is being closed, and the 9-branch is close to its next release.
>
> --
> Steve



--
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein