Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877

Tom Tromey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877

DJ Delorie-2

> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00528.html

Have you tried it with only the "!= xno" half of the conditional?  It
looks like, if you test that, you don't also need to test if it's set,
since "not set" is a subset of "not no".

Otherwise, OK.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Ping: patch for configure bug, PR libgcj/19877

Tom Tromey
>>>>> "DJ" == DJ Delorie <[hidden email]> writes:

>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q2/msg00528.html

DJ> Have you tried it with only the "!= xno" half of the conditional?  It
DJ> looks like, if you test that, you don't also need to test if it's set,
DJ> since "not set" is a subset of "not no".

I agree; I tested that and it worked.  I'm checking in the patch with
this change.

Tom