[Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

gcc - fortran mailing list
Hi again!

Proposed patch to Bug 90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even
though explicit bound is specified

Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Best regards,
José Rui

2020-4-19  José Rui Faustino de Sousa  <[hidden email]>

  PR fortran/90350
  * simplify.c (simplify_bound): In the case of assumed-size arrays check
  if the reference is to a full array.

2020-4-19  José Rui Faustino de Sousa  <[hidden email]>

  PR fortran/90350
  * PR90350.f90: New test.


PR90350.txt (2K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

gcc - fortran mailing list
Hi Jose,

> Proposed patch to Bug 90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even
> though explicit bound is specified
>
> Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> Best regards,
> José Rui

Looks good.

Do you have commit privileges? It not, I can commit it for you.

Regards

        Thomas

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

gcc - fortran mailing list
Hi Thomas,

On 21/04/20 16:38, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Do you have commit privileges? It not, I can commit it for you.
>

No i do not. I would be grateful if you could.

Best regards,
José Rui

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Patch v2, fortran] PR fortran/90350 - ubound ICE on assumed size array even though explicit bound is specified

gcc - fortran mailing list
Hi Jose,


> On 21/04/20 16:38, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>> Do you have commit privileges? It not, I can commit it for you.
>>
>
> No i do not. I would be grateful if you could.

Done, as
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=808a6eadda1a353ce3a70556feac128580491b24 
.

Thanks a lot for the patch!

Regards

        Thomas